Jump to content
Karlston

Developers leak benchmarks from the Apple silicon Mac transition kit

Recommended Posts

Karlston

Developers leak benchmarks from the Apple silicon Mac transition kit

How will legacy Mac apps perform under Rosetta on Apple silicon?

Photograph of a computer component in its box.
Enlarge / Developers are wasting no time getting their hands dirty with the new A12Z ARM Developer Transition Kits.

As reported by MacRumors, eager Apple developers are already posting benchmarks on the developer transition kits for Macs with Apple silicon. These kits are based on the Mac mini chassis but include ARM-derived Apple silicon rather than Intel CPUs.

 

Before we dig in, it's important to note a few caveats. First, the CPU included in these developer kits may or may not reflect the CPUs included in future Apple Macs. These are not consumer products; they're developer tools. Second, the benchmarks were done using Rosetta, which likely still has many changes and optimizations coming. And thirdly, the developers who've leaked this information are in violation of non-disclosure agreements at Apple.

 

Developers who wanted access to the kit were required to pay a $500 access fee, agree to return the kit after one year—and agree not to publicly write about, review, share, or display the unit without Apple's prior written approval. At least eight developers so far seem not to have read the fine print, judging by the uploads to Geekbench's online leaderboard.

 

There is currently no way of knowing whether these leaks are deliberate or accidental. At Ars, we frequently get to benchmark hardware that isn't available to the general public and whose details are under embargo as well—and we can confirm that you need to pay close attention to what you're doing. Most modern benchmark utilities have an online leaderboard, with an "upload results" button baked right into the utility—and in some cases, they even upload by default unless you specifically force them not to.

 

Accidental or not, the leaks give us some additional information about the potential performance of the new Macs with Apple silicon, though nothing conclusive. The developer transition kits are equipped with what seems to be a variant of the A12Z SoC found in the latest iPad Pro models. These Geekbench database entries also report the virtual CPU as four-core, rather than eight—even though the A12Z as we know it in the iPad Pro is an octa-core CPU.

 

Four of the A12Z's cores are high-power fast cores, and the other four are low-power slow cores used to increase battery efficiency when running background tasks. This configuration is common in the ARM world but nearly unheard of in x86. So it's not too surprising that an x86 emulation would ignore the big/little configuration and report itself as a simpler four-core setup regardless of underlying reality.

 

These tests appear to have been run in Geekbench 5.2.0 for macOS x86 (64-bit)—meaning they were run in Rosetta, Apple's tool for emulating x86 Macs on ARM-based Apple silicon.

 

As for the results, the Apple silicon-equipped developer kits average 811 for single-threaded Geekbench and 2781 for multi-threaded. That's about 20 percent slower than the entry-level i3-1000ng4 powered Macbook Air's single-core results and 38 percent faster than its multi-threaded results. Higher-end Macs produce much higher numbers, though.

 

What's impressive about these leaked numbers is that they're not for Geekbench running natively in ARM mode. These tell us what emulation of legacy apps might look like on Apple silicon Macs—and it's likely early adopters of Apple's new ARM-based Macs will use Rosetta to run at least some apps, so it's a potentially useful insight.

 

Rosetta 2's performance characteristics aren't well-known enough yet to meaningfully extrapolate the A12Z's native performance—but if the leaked numbers are correct, we can assume it will be quite good.

 

All that said, there is no indication yet that the A12Z will actually ship in consumer Macs. Apple may have plans to introduce a very different chip when it actually comes to market with the new Macs, so while these benchmarks are an intriguing curiosity, they are not certain to be representative of what we'll see when the real deal arrives later this year. These kits weren't designed to reflect the final hardware of Apple silicon Macs.

 

 

Developers leak benchmarks from the Apple silicon Mac transition kit

 

ThanksForReading200x49.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
zanderthunder

Benchmarks are in for Apple's ARM64 macOS development kit, and they smoke the Surface Pro X

 

1592851529_screenshot_(117)_story.jpg

 

Just a week ago, Apple confirmed its plan to transition its Mac lineup to its own custom ARM64 processors. The company also started seeding a Developer Transition Kit, packing an A12Z chipset, 16GB RAM, and a 512GB SSD into a Mac mini chassis. Now, the first benchmarks are in.

 

In the Geekbench 5 test, the dev kit seems to score ~835 on single-core and ~2,800 on multi-core. Here's the full list.

 

1593449362_capture_story.jpg

 

This is something that's fun to look at, since it's new and exciting, but to be clear, these scores don't mean anything. Any actual Mac using the company's ARM64 processors likely won't be using an A12Z chipset, which is the one found in current iPad Pro tablets. And of course, this is very pre-production.

 

Compared to the iPad Pro, it doesn't do too well. This is no surprise, given that Geekbench 5 is running in emulation on the Mac and natively on the iPad. The latest iPad Pro gets about 1,120 on single-core and about 4,650 on multi-core.

 

We can also compare this to an entry-level MacBook Air with an Intel Core i3-1000NG4. That unit got 1,083 on single-core and 2,246 on multi-core. Of course, the Core i3 is dual-core, which is why the multi-core score comes out so low. The Core i5 model, which is quad-core, got 1,152 and 3,841 on single-core and multi-core, respectively.

 

Of course, Microsoft has its own Windows 10 PCs running on ARM64 processors, and at the top of the lineup is the Surface Pro X. The device uses a custom, overclocked version of the Snapdragon 8cx called the Microsoft SQ1. Unfortunately, Microsoft-branded chipsets don't measure up to Apple-branded SoCs too well, scoring 765 on single-core and 2,985 on multi-core. Moreover, while Geekbench 5 is running in emulation on the Mac, it's actually running natively on the Surface Pro X.

 

Both the A12 Bionic and the Snapdragon 8cx are over a year and a half old. Apple will have custom chips designed for Macs, and Qualcomm should be refreshing the Snapdragon 8cx pretty soon. Competition is always good, and hopefully these two companies can push each other.

 

Update: Added information about the Surface Pro X.

Source: Benchmarks are in for Apple's ARM64 macOS development kit, and they smoke the Surface Pro X (via Neowin)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...