New Microsoft Edge browser uses up to 27% less memory on Windows 10 version 2004

[Karlston]

New Microsoft Edge browser uses up to 27% less memory on Windows 10 version 2004

If you keep an eye on memory usage on your Windows devices and run a device with Windows 10 version 2004, you may have noticed that Microsoft's new Chromium-based Microsoft Edge web browser uses less memory on that version of Windows.

 

The new Microsoft Edge web browser uses the same core as Google Chrome, and Google's browser is notorious for using a lot of RAM when it is in use. Memory use depends largely on the activity on the Internet; users who open just one or two sites will see less memory usage usually than users who open lots of sites and keep them active.

 

Microsoft seems to have found a way to reduce the memory usage of the company's new web browser but only on Windows 10 version 2004. The company released the feature update for Windows 10 last month and has rolled it out slowly to eligible devices.

 

 

According to a blog post by Microsoft Principal PM Manager, Microsoft Edge, Kim Denny on the Microsoft Edge Dev blog, the new Microsoft Edge may use up to 27% memory less on the new version of Windows 10 than on previous versions.

 

Denny explains that Microsoft implemented Windows segment heap memory improvements in the browser that reduce memory usage.

With the Windows 10 May 2020 Update, Microsoft Edge has leveraged the Windows segment heap memory improvements now available for Win32 applications to manage memory more efficiently. Early internal testing results of devices on the May 2020 Update are showing a memory usage reduction of up to 27% when browsing with Microsoft Edge.

Segment Heap has been available to UWP applications only in previous versions of Windows 10. Microsoft announced Project Reunion recently in an attempt to unify the Windows development platform. With UWP having stayed behind expectations, Microsoft decided to unlock UWP specific APIs such as segment heap so that Win32 programs can use these as well.

 

Microsoft Edge is the first Win32 application that makes use of segment heap but the API is available for all developers. It is possible that other browsers, e.g. Firefox or Chrome, and also other programs, make use of the API to reduce the memory usage of applications that run on the Windows 10 platform. (via Deskmodder)

 

 

New Microsoft Edge browser uses up to 27% less memory on Windows 10 version 2004

 

[ nSane Frontpage ... Microsoft Edge 83.0.478.54 ]

 

[Edion Gecos]

It is interesting and quite telling that Microsoft dos not offer any highly critical security updates for Windows 7 anymore (at least not for millions of "normal" users), but now instead is pushing its new Edge web browser as an "important update" to all those same Windows 7 users....   

[NightWalker]

18 hours ago, Edion Gecos said:

It is interesting and quite telling that Microsoft dos not offer any highly critical security updates for Windows 7 anymore (at least not for millions of "normal" users), but now instead is pushing its new Edge web browser as an "important update" to all those same Windows 7 users....   

And so what? What is the big deal with a corporation trying to make money with its products/services?

 

Security updates costs money for Microsoft, while the Edge update can be a revenue source with the default search engine thing, it is not hard to understand why the latter would be prioritized in EOL products.

 

It is not that interesting and telling at all, Windows 7 is literally a one decade old product, with a justified end-of-life status, just let it die and use the much better OS called Windows 10 (that was a free upgrade for years).

 

What is really interesting is the double standard that people usually judge Microsoft actions/policies, while Google (with its terrible product lifetime support) has a free pass for example.

[Edion Gecos]

It seems I triggered a M$ and Win10 fan boy/girl... 

 

But anyhow: It is still interesting and telling that Microsoft pushes its browser as an important update to a "one decade old product, with a justified end-of-life status" that it should "just let (to) die".

Why not - if it has to be - as an optional update for those poor deplorable lost souls who did not yet find their way to the glorious shiny beacon on the hill that simply has to be loved by everyone.... Why, oh why not? It is so shiny and new!!!!

 

And by the way, I don't use any Google products or services...