Jump to content
ADN

Internet Download Manager 6.33 Build 1

Recommended Posts

samo84

Thanks to all. But waiting for Aliza3mi cracked and patched version.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
sulim
Posted (edited)

Internet Download Manager 6.33.1 (Repack)  ELCHUPACABRA

Spoiler

Features of Internet Download Manager repack:
1. Does not require registration (patch mixed + keygen ADMIN @ CRACK)
2. Multilingual interface 
3. Optional installation of 35 additional toolbars
4. Optional IDM Backup Manager Installation
5. Selection when installing certain program options:
- Run IDM when the computer boots
- Launch IE browser control module
- Show categories
6. Small editing of the program menu
7. Ability to install modifications of Glyfz 2016 or Windows 10 (in addition to the additional toolbar,
category icons, dialog icons and main program icon are changed)
8. Picks up settings from external file settings.reg
9. The ability to pick up and auto-copy custom toolbars from the toolbars folder, if any
is located nearby during installation, and it is also possible to autorun the file toolbars.exe, which may contain
user panels in sfx-archive.
10. In addition to the installation, there is an “Update” mode in which the files are unpacked
New version, WITHOUT any additional installer actions, changing user settings, entries
in the registry (except for a few keys with the number of the updated version), installation of additional components.

 

Site: https://www.upload.ee
Sharecode: /files/9936456/Internet_Download_Manager_6.33.1.exe.html

 

 

Edited by sulim

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
BTJB
Posted (edited)
9 hours ago, xanax said:

again...

what patch?

what mismatch (omission)?

"It say patched, but it is not" what is not patched?

what is half fixed?

 

I had already mentioned the problem, but you didn't pay attention. I checked how patch works on older versions. Older is equivalent to further improved in protection versions and leads to partially patch. No matter how much patterns are fixed, the patch report that everything is fine and the file is patched. I checked how usually it must be. For example:

 

Patch1 and Patch2 have the same actions!

Patch1 - xanax

Patch2 - someone else with same fix

==================================

Fix with success:

Patch1 - report file is patched successfully.

Patch2 - report file is patched successfully.

 

Fix partial without full success:

Patch1 - report file is patched successfully.

Patch2 - Report unable to find pattern, file is patched.

 

Fix without any success:

Patch1 - (unable to find pattern) Nothing patched

Patch2 - (unable to find pattern) Nothing patched

 

My experiment show me partial fix on older version (half patched) but the patch say it was patched and no more notes about fail. So, if further version can not be fully patched, your patch still say it was patched.

Did you understand me now?

I am grateful to you for the work and I greatly appreciate your merits. I hope you do not get me wrong.

Edited by BTJB

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
T3rM1nat0Rr3
8 hours ago, BTJB said:

Patch1 and Patch2 have the same actions!

 

Or "appear" to have the same actions. Provide a link then @xanax can compare them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
BTJB
Posted (edited)
17 hours ago, T3rM1nat0Rr3 said:

Or "appear" to have the same actions. Provide a link then @xanax can compare them.

 

Both patches patch the same, one of them will bypass log report "Can't find pattern". On my third attempt to confirm my words it show the same result, but this time in reverse - the @xanax patch show me the whole log including "Can't find pattern", but other patch bypass this info.

I doubt it is depends on which patch was loaded first at first run. The first patch should report the whole log. The second patch should skip "Can't find pattern" report. I tried VM if it is depends on temporary LOG file, but restoring the point wasn't able to isolate this issue. So, pay attention which patch you run at first time!

To compare the output patched files I am using the user friendly FlexHEX and recommend it.

 

HERE IS SELF EXTRACTING ARCHIVE TO DEFAULT DIR:

Site: www.upload.ee
Sharecode: /files/9941026/Patch_Issue.exe.html

Edited by BTJB
updated SFX in english module language

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
xanax
Posted (edited)

:dunno:

" Both patches patch the same, one of them will bypass log report "Can't find pattern". On my third attempt to confirm my words it show the same result, but this time in reverse - the @xanax patch show me the whole log including "Can't find pattern", but other patch bypass this info.  "

 

"So, pay attention which patch you run at first time! "

 

really, what you are doing?

 

and what is in arhive? my patch, your patch (don't know why with my nick in about window) and some already modded IDMan.exe which looks like from Trial v6.32.7

what to do with that modified IDMan.exe? try to patch already modified file? compare it with what?

my patch was always for retail version, never tested on trial

don't have 6.32.7 Trial installer to try see what you try to say

 

P.S.

search and replace patterns doesn't need to be same in different patchers to give same result, and depend on approach will or will not report "Can't find pattern"

and that 's not all, thare is more scenario which can give all kind of log report

 

don't know why you rely so much on the patch report

and how about patch what should be patched? original file, not already patched file

maybe you will be less confused with patch report

Edited by xanax

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
BTJB
9 hours ago, xanax said:

what is in arhive? my patch, your patch (don't know why with my nick in about window) and some already modded IDMan.exe which looks like from Trial v6.32.7

what to do with that modified IDMan.exe? try to patch already modified file? compare it with what?

 

- Your nick is there because you have great merit... :yes:

- I am sorry about modified IDM! I found right now that it should have digital signature. The fault is again by @TheBig Once I warned him about confused description with update, now he completely destroy the expectation! For my convenience I took his installer because was difficult for me to find old version. His installer have two options: Acivate IDM (Yes / No) , and its look like he offer untouched Trial, but actually he didn't delivered it in both options! No matter, we just try how patches work on the modified, new or old incompatible versions.

- We need comparison between two patched IDMan.exe from two different patches. You will see that they are doing the same changes. But different report!

 

The only mistake I made it was omission to change the language module of SFX archive. So now it is in great English!
 

Both patches will patch the same content, one of them will bypass the log report "Can't find pattern".

SFX-English

Site: https://www.upload.ee
Sharecode: /files/9941026/Patch_Issue.exe.html

 

Still can't find explain for different logs.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Alza3im1

DjZv5fv.png

Internet Download Manager v6.33 Build 1 Final + Crack (IDMan.exe) _8.92MB
Site: https://www.datafilehost.com
Sharecode: /d/007aef03

Site: https://www.upload.ee
Sharecode: /files/9940489/Internet_Download_Manager_v6.33_Build_1_Final.rar.html

 

Internet Download Manager v6.33 Build 1 Final + Patch _9.11MB
Site: https://www.datafilehost.com
Sharecode: /d/bd473dd9

Site: https://www.upload.ee
Sharecode: /files/9940325/Internet_Download_Manager_v6.33_Build_1_Final.rar.html

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
xanax

 

11 hours ago, BTJB said:

Still can't find explain for different logs.

 

D10N4 patch - patching original IDMan.exe 6.32.7 Trial
offset: 11BCEA => 755B->7500

 

PileNGril patch - patching original IDMan.exe 6.32.7 Trial
offset: 11BCEA => 755B->7500

 

PileNGril patch - patching patched IDMan.exe 6.32.7 Trial from TheBig repack
offset: 11BCEA => EB05->EB05 (nothing is patched)

 

check your S&R pattern and then explain logs to yourself

there is no need to involve other patchers into your nonsense actions

 

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
BTJB
Posted (edited)
8 hours ago, xanax said:

patching patched IDMan.exe 6.32.7 Trial from TheBig repack

offset: 11BCEA => EB05->EB05 (nothing is patched)

 

check your S&R pattern and then explain logs to yourself

 

To myself my search pattern can not find the pattern, because the search pattern was modified! Note these words underline. But the log for me does not report any info about missing pattern!

Just a little example...

My search:

11 22 33 44 55 66 will replace with ?? ?? ?? 00 ?? ??

instead it already have completely different data

11 22 88 99 55 66 and after the patch attempt it stay with 11 22 88 99 55 66 - because the pattern wasn't found!!!!!

 

THIS IS NOT AS:

Search:

11 22 ?? ?? 55 66 to replace with 11 22 88 99 55 66

My search is not like that!

 

To yourself your search pattern can not find the pattern too - and the log say that the pattern can not be found.

Do you see the problem?

Edited by BTJB

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Karamjit
On 5/6/2019 at 7:51 AM, TheBig said:

Site: https://cloud.mail.ru
Sharecode: /public/3mUN/3oPnceTrY

Kaspersky doesn't spare .exe file and flags this as a threat to the system...reverted back to previous version provided by you....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
BTJB
2 hours ago, Karamjit said:

Kaspersky doesn't spare .exe file and flags this as a threat to the system...reverted back to previous version provided by you....

 

@hakah complained to me that the icon on the desktop was deleted by Kaspersky as well.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Karamjit
43 minutes ago, BTJB said:

@hakah complained to me that the icon on the desktop was deleted by Kaspersky as well.

yes dear, same here. but older version by TheBig nicely works without any p[roblem.....so i embraced the older version

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
BTJB
8 minutes ago, Karamjit said:

yes dear, same here. but older version by TheBig nicely works without any p[roblem.....so i embraced the older version

 

Something is changed by @TheBig . He may explain.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
info999

I wonder how long it would take to reach version 7 LOL

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
BTJB
10 minutes ago, info999 said:

I wonder how long it would take to reach version 7 LOL

 

The major version can be changed at any moment whenever developer decide. In this case I guess it is depends on the new members in developer team. If new member is signed, than new major version is coming. :D 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
xanax
Posted (edited)
14 hours ago, BTJB said:

Do you see the problem? 

 

looks like a bug (dUP 2.26.1)

if s&r pattern is last in project it will report like everything is patched

if you move that search pattern for example one place up it will report Can't find pattern! Trying next one...  as it should be

in d10n4 patch that one is not last one because it's added new one for corrupted exe (popup window after 20min) so i didn't notice anything strange in this case

 

 

Edited by xanax

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
BTJB
7 minutes ago, xanax said:

looks like a bug (dUP 2.26.1)

if s&r pattern is last in project it will report like everything is patched

if you move that search pattern for example one place up it will report Can't find pattern! Trying next one...  as it should be

 

S&R is up in the middle. I have registry patch after. Did you used an older version or you are using the same 2.26.1?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
xanax
1 hour ago, BTJB said:

 

S&R is up in the middle. I have registry patch after. Did you used an older version or you are using the same 2.26.1?

 

i'm not talking about position in the main window, in "Search and Replace Patch" window

i use 2.26.1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
BTJB

You are extremely profound @xanax:wub: So far I have not met a man like you, thanks for all man!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...