Welcome to nsane.forums

Welcome to nsane.forums, like most online communities you need to register to view parts of our community or to make contributions, but don't worry: this is a free and simple process that requires minimal information. Be a part of nsane.forums by signing in or creating an account.

  • Access special members only forums
  • Start new topics and reply to others
  • Subscribe to topics and forums to get automatic updates

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Karlston

Driver fix for Surface Pro 2017 hibernation seems to work; now, about that backlight bleed

2 posts in this topic

Microsoft’s latest Surface Pro appears to have kicked the narcolepsy problem, but many customers still aren’t happy

microsoft surface pro 4 display detail
Credit: Peter Ruecktenwald

Two weeks ago, I wrote about an ongoing problem with the new Surface Pro, commonly called Surface Pro 2017. Many customers found that their machines suddenly turned off—went into hibernation for no apparent reason, sometimes swallowing data in the process. After hemming and hawing about it for a few weeks, Microsoft released a new driver on July 14. Reports I’ve seen say the new driver works.

 

Now, on to the next problem.

 

On July 8, poster Surface Guy on the Microsoft Answers forum lamented:

My new Surface Pro 2017 core i7 8GB (lot 1722) has backlight bleed on the whole bottom edge and left side of the screen. You don't normally notice it in landscape mode because the black taskbar hides it, but if you read a white background fullscreen article in portrait mode it's pretty obvious with one side of the screen being brighter than the other side. This light bleed is most noticeable in the colours blue and white and harder to see in black colours (which are usually used in backlight bleed tests).

Looking at the photos on the Answers forum post, it’s easy to see the bleeding.

Surface Guy links to 13 different Reddit threads on the same topic. In one, poster CheerfulMike narrows it down:

Open OneNote or Google's home page and hold the Surface in portrait. That's when you'll see whether you want to keep it or not. No one really looks at solid colour screens except as you're showing, during boot or updates. So for me, the real test was discolouration in portrait (since the task bar hides it in landscape) and lots of them have a back light bleed that then makes a smudgy black shadow on white pages in portrait. Try it and see what you think.

At the end of the day, it's about what you're willing to accept for the price you paid. For some, it's absolutely unacceptable and for others it's something they can overlook. Totally up to you.

In a private email, reader SG added a directed diatribe:

They have sold a premium product with the display quality of a cheap tablet. Don't say it's a common issue in IPS displays because in the current Surface Pro 4 it's not visible at all compared to this fiasco in all the Surface Pro 2017 models. You can't even exchange it because your exchanged model would have the backlight bleed as well!

This isn't a Surface Lemon, it's a BRICK!

Judging by the back-and-forth discussions online, it’s likely that there’s some variation in the amount of bleed—on some machines, with some apps, it’s quite noticeable. On other machines, and for other customers, it’s not a big deal.

 

You've got to ask yourself one question: "Do I feel lucky?" Well, do ya?

Discussion continues on the AskWoody Lounge.

 

Source: Driver fix for Surface Pro 2017 hibernation seems to work; now, about that backlight bleed (Computerworld - Woody Leonhard)

2 people liked / thanked this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

And Microsoft fails again at trying to do an "Apple" thing .  They can't even produce a good hardware/software combination where they have control over everything, a la Apple, so why should anyone expect them to produce a secure, working copy of Windows in only 35 years.  They should have taken all those people they laid off in marketing and put them in quality control, but first they would have to create that department because Windows makes it obvious they don't have one.  Two things to keep in mind.  First, as much as people ridicule Apple, their systems work with few problems and any problems that arise are fixed fairly quickly.  Secondly, if Apple hadn't been so protective in sharing their hardware and software we would all be using Apple computers and Microsoft probably wouldn't even exist because Apple was approached first about building clones and they refused whereas IBM said sure.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0