humble3d Posted December 4, 2016 Share Posted December 4, 2016 Who is Behind “Fake News” ? Mainstream Media Use Fake Videos and Images The mainstream corporate media is desperate. MEDIA VIA THE LINK BELOW... They want to suppress independent and alternative online media, which it categorizes as “fake news”. Readers on social media are warned not to go onto certain sites. The intent of this initiative is to smear honest reporting and Truth in Media. Our analysis confirms that the mainstream media are routinely involved in distorting the facts and turning realities upside down. They are the unspoken architects of “Fake News”. One area of routine distortion is the use of fake videos and images by the mainstream media. Four Notorious Cases of Media Distortion These are four examples and there are many more. The manipulation of videos and images is routine. In some cases, these manipulations are revealed by readers, independent media and social media. In most cases they go undetected. And when they are revealed, the media will say “sorry” we apologize: they will then point to technical errors. “we got the wrong video”. What is important to emphasize is that these media distortions are invariably deliberate. 1. Coverage of CNN 2008 Riots in Tibet Chinese Cops with khaki uniforms and Indian Style Moustaches The video footage, which accompanied CNN’s John Vause’s report, had nothing to do with China. The police were not Chinese, but Indian cops in khaki uniforms from the Northeastern State of Himachal Pradesh, India. Viewers were led to believe that demonstrations inside China were peaceful and that people were being arrested by Chinese cops. Chinese Cops in Khaki Uniforms? 1'.27-1'.44? video footage of “Chinese cops” and demonstrators including Buddhist monks. Chinese cops are shown next to Tibetan monks Are these Chinese Cops from Gansu Province or Lhasa, the Tibetan capital, as suggested by CNN’s John Vause’s Report? REPORT ON CHINA, MARCH 14, 2008 Alleged Chinese cops in khaki uniforms repressing Tibet demonstrators in China, CNN, March 14, 2008 1’38?, 1’40? (images above) Their khaki uniforms with berets seem to bear the imprint of the British colonial period. Khaki colored uniforms were first introduced in the British cavalry in India in 1846. Khaki means “dust” in Hindi and Persian. Moreover, the cops with khaki uniforms and mustache do not look Chinese. Look carefully. They are Indian cops. The videotape shown on March 14, 2008 by CNN is not from China (Gansu Province or Lhasa, Tibet’s Capital). The video was taken in the State of Himachal Pradesh, India. The videotape of the Tibet protest movement in India was used in the CNN report on the Tibet protest movement within China. CNN got its countries screwed up. 2. BBC Coverage of the War on Libya, 2011 Green Square Tripoli. Libyans Celebrating “Liberation” and the Victory of Rebel forces over Gadaffi waving Indian Flags Examine the footage: It’s not Green Square and it’s not the King Idris Flag (red, black green) of the Rebels. Its the Indian flag (orange, white and green) and the people at the rally are Indians. Perhaps you did not even notice it. And if you did notice, ”it was probably a mistake”. Sloppy journalism at the BBC or outright Lies and Fabrications? Recognize the flags? Indian Flag Libya’s Rebel Flag (King Idris) Terrorists “celebrating” in Green Square There is no celebration. It is a NATO sponsored massacre which has resulted in several thousand deaths. But the truth cannot be shown on network television. The impacts of NATO bombings have been obfuscated. The rebels are heralded as ”liberators”. NATO bombing is intended to save civilian lives under The Alliance’s R2P mandate. But the realities are otherwise: the civilian population is being terrorized by the NATO sponsored Rebels. The images must be switched to conform to the “NATO consensus”. Death and destruction is replaced by fabricated images of celebration and liberation. 3. CNN and BBC on 9/11. The Report on the Collapse of WTC Building Seven Occurred Prior to the Collapse Fake News regarding the Collapse of WTC Building Seven The most grotesque lie pertains to the BBC and CNN announcement in the afternoon of September 11, that WTC Building Seven (The Solomon Building) had collapsed. The BBC report went live at 5.00pm, 21 minutes before the actual occurrence of the collapse, indelibly pointing to foreknowledge of the collapse of WTC 7. CNN anchor Aaron Brown announced that the building “has either collapsed or is collapsing” about an hour before the event. (See WTC7.net the hidden story of Building 7: Foreknowledge of WTC 7's Collapse) The Collapse of WTC Building Seven. “CNN anchor Aaron Brown seems to struggle to make sense of what he is seeing one minute after announcing that WTC Building 7, whose erect facade is clearly visible in his view towards the Trade Center, has or is collapsing.” See the complete Global Research article 4. The March 2016 Brussels Terrorist Attacks. Belgian Media Used Video of a 2011 Moscow Airport Terrorist Attack Brussels News media Dernière Heure at dhnet.be as well as La Libre reported on the terror attacks by providing a CC Camera Airport Surveillance Video of the terror attacks. The published video footage was fake as documented by a blog posting on Media Part. The video pertains to a terror attack at Moscow’s Domodedovo airport on 24 January 2011 (posted on youtube in November 2013). The report of DHnet.be on the Brussels airport attack used the video of the Moscow 2011 attack with the date of the Brussels attack: (22/03/2016) pasted onto the Russian video. Below is the screenshot of DH’s report. And here is a screenshot of the January 2011 terror attack at Moscow’s Domodedova International Airport published on youtube in November 2013 followed by the full youtube video of the Moscow attack: According to the BBC (January 24, 2011) report (which includes the video), the Moscow 2011 airport attack resulted in 35 dead. Concluding Remarks The lies and fabrications of the MSM are not the result of “sloppy journalism”. They are deliberate and are intended to mislead the public. The mainstream media routinely uses fake images and videos in its coverage of the war on Syria. The campaign against alternative and independent media seeks to limit freedom of expression. http://www.globalresearch.ca/who-is-behind-fake-news-mainstream-media-use-fake-videos-and-images/5557580 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
edwardecl Posted December 4, 2016 Share Posted December 4, 2016 Anything not first vetted by the government is fake news. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pc71520 Posted December 4, 2016 Share Posted December 4, 2016 C.N.N., B.B.C., and their "Polls" before the U.S. Presidential election. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flitox Posted December 4, 2016 Share Posted December 4, 2016 12 minutes ago, edwardecl said: Anything not first vetted by the government is fake news. damn right!! but thats again nothing new under the sun, have you guys already forget the protocols of the elders of zion?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nIGHT Posted December 7, 2016 Share Posted December 7, 2016 I still enjoy reading fake news like that movie that there's an asteroid hitting the earth in hbo everyone in the house panicked and til one of us said let see cnn. hehehe! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dMog Posted December 8, 2016 Share Posted December 8, 2016 so basically the haters of governments rely on sources like alex jones and people and websites just like him and Infowars for the real truth...really.... I mean really...talk about substituting one sheepherder for a far worse sheepherder Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
edwardecl Posted December 9, 2016 Share Posted December 9, 2016 On 08/12/2016 at 0:12 AM, dMog said: so basically the haters of governments rely on sources like alex jones and people and websites just like him and Infowars for the real truth...really.... I mean really...talk about substituting one sheepherder for a far worse sheepherder That's why you don't believe anything you read and only half of what you see. All of the media is 'fake' or at least poorly researched, even big organisations like NASA get caught out, people who should know better. Almost all of the main stream media has turned into propaganda, they don;t report much of the news any more, they just put their angle on it and lie by omission, selectively choose not to report things against their view which they should not have. You have to read all the news sources and pair news articles together that cancel each other out and look at the sources and methodology/research that has been reworded. It's sad you need to do this because nobody has news, they are all propagandists. When I read 'allegedly' or 'expert's opinion' without giving a name or when there are no sources at all in an article that's the cue to stop reading. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
knowledge-Spammer Posted December 14, 2016 Share Posted December 14, 2016 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flash48 Posted December 14, 2016 Share Posted December 14, 2016 Ha Ha, I like fake news. It is more entertaining than those reality shows. But unfortunately real harm is done when low information people think it is real and believe it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
knowledge-Spammer Posted December 14, 2016 Share Posted December 14, 2016 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ThisPC666 Posted December 15, 2016 Share Posted December 15, 2016 4 hours ago, knowledge said: i was just reading about her. MSM is sickening. UN even blamed Russia for defeating ISIS. watta a joke Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steven36 Posted December 15, 2016 Share Posted December 15, 2016 Quote The Real 'Fake News' Is The Mainstream Media It's been a little more than a month since an election that was the kind of seismic event in our politics that only happens once a century. It sent shock waves through the national political establishment and pretty much any other group of prognosticators that had been banking on an easy Clinton win. No one felt the sting more than the mainstream media. The morning after the election, anchors and columnists were making a collective stammering Act of Contrition about just how "wrong" they were about the election - and the electorate. But in the month since, the so-called mainstream media have, as if in coordinated fashion, executed a transparent strategy to bludgeon the president-elect at every turn. Republicans, Conservatives, Independents and the majority of Americans who actually want to give Donald Trump a chance to lead will likely see through this anti-Trump propaganda campaign, but perhaps a review of their strategy is instructive at this point. Media outlets have again shown they are doubling down on the same strategy that has driven their own approval ratings close to - dare I say - Congressional territory. That's right. Survey after survey finds the same media that has made beating up conservatives, Republicans and religious institutions an industry has seen their tactics boomerang on them. Even actor Denzel Washington blasted the media last week saying that, "One of the effects of "too much information is the need to be first, not even to be true anymore." Hope for better isn't a strategy and change isn't coming. Here's the anti-Trump plan of attack in all its banality. Some of these elements will have a shelf life. Some will be part of a prolonged effort. The strategy has several key components that have quickly taken shape over the last few weeks. First, they are advancing a strategy of attempting to tie the president-elect and his team to the so-called "alt-right" and neo-Nazi, white supremacist lunatics. Despite Trump and his transition team issuing multiple statements denouncing the activities of a number of groups, the media still provided hours of coverage to small pockets of hate groups that used the election as a recruiting tool. It's been a little more than a month since an election that was the kind of seismic event in our politics that only happens once a century. It sent shock waves through the national political establishment and pretty much any other group of prognosticators that had been banking on an easy Clinton win. No one felt the sting more than the mainstream media. The morning after the election, anchors and columnists were making a collective stammering Act of Contrition about just how "wrong" they were about the election - and the electorate. But in the month since, the so-called mainstream media have, as if in coordinated fashion, executed a transparent strategy to bludgeon the president-elect at every turn. Republicans, Conservatives, Independents and the majority of Americans who actually want to give Donald Trump a chance to lead will likely see through this anti-Trump propaganda campaign, but perhaps a review of their strategy is instructive at this point. Media outlets have again shown they are doubling down on the same strategy that has driven their own approval ratings close to - dare I say - Congressional territory. That's right. Survey after survey finds the same media that has made beating up conservatives, Republicans and religious institutions an industry has seen their tactics boomerang on them. Even actor Denzel Washington blasted the media last week saying that, "One of the effects of "too much information is the need to be first, not even to be true anymore." Hope for better isn't a strategy and change isn't coming. Here's the anti-Trump plan of attack in all its banality. Some of these elements will have a shelf life. Some will be part of a prolonged effort. The strategy has several key components that have quickly taken shape over the last few weeks. First, they are advancing a strategy of attempting to tie the president-elect and his team to the so-called "alt-right" and neo-Nazi, white supremacist lunatics. Despite Trump and his transition team issuing multiple statements denouncing the activities of a number of groups, the media still provided hours of coverage to small pockets of hate groups that used the election as a recruiting tool. Recommended by Forbes A sub-component to this was advancing a message that the country was in turmoil in the days after the election because of widespread protests against the newly-elected president. Even Fox News put a graphic on the screen that proclaimed there was "Anarchy in America." Again, more sensationalized information that only bares a faint resemblance to the truth. Yes, there were protests in a number of cities as well as sit-ins and cry-ins on college campuses filled with whiny young people who have little grasp on the realities of life. But to suggest that there is widespread discontent and a surge in the size, number and strength of hate groups in this country who are supposedly empowered by the Trump campaign or aligned with the president-elect is nonsense. Incidents that qualify as hate crimes, like racist graffiti did spike after the election, but a real, honest analysis of these events will show that a sustained, coordinated grassroots movement against American pluralistic values and racial tolerance is not developing. This is what happens when you try to stretch 10 minutes of news into 24 hours of coverage. Third, the press have pushed several key messages to delegitamize the president-elect. Let's take them in order. First, the media is aggressively driving the narrative that Trump didn't win the popular vote. This part of the playbook was dusted off from George W. Bush's 2000 election. Of course the big brains in the media never mention to their readers and viewers the simple fact that the Electoral College - whatever you might think about it - dictates the strategy of national elections. If you ran a popular vote strategy, you'd run a completely different campaign in terms of allocation of time and resources. The game is not winning the popular vote, like it or not. Further, there is no evidence that had the campaigns executed a popular vote strategy that Clinton would have won. Actually to the contrary, given the marked enthusiasm deficit on the Democrat side, Trump would likely have mobilized more voters from his states than Clinton would have in hers. Also, keep in mind that Clinton did have a robust turnout operation in key urban and suburban districts where she needed to perform well with her base. She still under-performed in those places that also would have been critical to a popular vote victory. http://www.forbes.com/sites/steveforbes/2016/12/14/the-forbes-2016-all-star-eateries-in-new-york/#45a0048a48ff Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steven36 Posted December 15, 2016 Share Posted December 15, 2016 On undefined at 7:36 AM, edwardecl said: You have to read all the news sources and pair news articles together that cancel each other out and look at the sources and methodology/research that has been reworded. It's sad you need to do this because nobody has news, they are all propagandists. When you watch news on TV they go to the source but they still cut out parts they don't want you too see . So news has always been written to fit a countries agenda. This day and time with channels like CSPAN you can watch what really goes on in politics as it happens. On undefined at 7:36 AM, edwardecl said: When I read 'allegedly' or 'expert's opinion' without giving a name or when there are no sources at all in an article that's the cue to stop reading. Opinions are not propaganda there peoples views on things if you don't ever listen too no ones opinions it means you already think you know it all and are closed minded too others view points. Some of the smartest people in the world seek others opinions . That's what makes the world go around . Most so called news like about software and things there source will be nothing but some posters opinion on reddit or twitter etc. or a add too try to sell you something. a opinion that's it's worth buying or using. That's what i do when I come to nsane is listen to everyone's opinion. So if opinion is propaganda what you just said would be anti press propaganda too someone who loves too watch the news . Opinions are a human right like them or not. I listen to all opinions but i don't agree but with some but i still respect there right too have one . I'm open minded but I don't want too be so open mined that my brain falls out. A grown man should not believe everything he reads on the internet no ways . Quote The United Nations' 1948 Universal Declaration of Human Rights states: "Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference, and impart information and ideas through any media regardless of frontiers" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
knowledge-Spammer Posted December 15, 2016 Share Posted December 15, 2016 6 hours ago, ThisPC666 said: i was just reading about her. MSM is sickening. UN even blamed Russia for defeating ISIS. watta a joke she a smart lady Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
knowledge-Spammer Posted December 16, 2016 Share Posted December 16, 2016 this is the problem this man Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
straycat19 Posted December 16, 2016 Share Posted December 16, 2016 1 hour ago, knowledge said: this is the problem this man Actually this isn't fake news, this is no news. However, governments are good about using spin doctors to do their public announcements. No comment, or a lack of a comment, usually means they can't think of anything logical, reasonable, or truthful to say. In our current administration we call it 'Plantation Speak'. Putin is going to be disappointed when Obama leaves office, he won't have anyone to shine his shoes and kiss his ass. Obama says we will do something about the supposed Russian hacking during the election, but he won't do anything. If there was ever a bigger pussy in the white house it would have been when Theodore Roosevelt was president and he had 23 cats. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steven36 Posted December 16, 2016 Share Posted December 16, 2016 What i would like too know what do the fake news and the other topic about Trump that was closed got too do with security and privacy ? Nothing that i know of they should be posted in general news . I posted about fake news before and I posted it were it belonged . It was about a newspaper that use to expose fake news every week but stop doing it because most all news is fake . There is all kinds security and privacy news people could be posting in this section of the board but they rather post General news here ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
knowledge-Spammer Posted December 16, 2016 Share Posted December 16, 2016 this comment so good i like Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.