Jump to content

Kaspersky Lab files complaint against Microsoft for giving unfair advantage to Windows Defender


Batu69

Recommended Posts

Russian antivirus vendor Kaspersky Lab has asked antitrust regulators in various countries (including the European Union and Russia) to make Microsoft stop giving an unfair advantage to Windows Defender.

 

kaspersky-lab-logo-1

 

Microsoft is making it hard for independent virus vendors to compete with Windows Defender, Microsoft’s own antivirus application built-in to Windows 8 and Windows 10, according to founder of Kaspersky Lab, Eugene Kaspersky.

 

For example, when users upgraded to Windows 10, their own antivirus product was disabled and Windows Defender was enabled by default.

Another showcase of Microsoft’s way of making it harder to compete is that antivirus companies only received a week to make their antivirus software compatible with Windows 10. And even when the antivirus software was compatible, Windows Defender would be enabled nevertheless.

 

If Windows Defender was disabled (and other antivirus software was running)  it would show a warning, asking the user to uninstall their antivirus software and to turn on Windows Defender. Kaspersky argues that many users would think, “well, it’s from Microsoft – the people who make the OS; must be good; no harm in turning it on for sure”.

 

Another complaint Kaspersky has is that Microsoft has limited the possibilities antivirus companies have to warn users that their license is about to expire. Microsoft only allows a warning in the Windows Security Center, which normally users hardly ever read. If the user doesn’t timely extend his license, the antivirus software is disabled and Windows Defender is activated.

 

Kaspersky also criticizes the fact that Microsoft has limited the number of virus scanners users can have on a single system. One antivirus application is normally allowed, except for Microsoft’s own Windows Defender. Even when another antivirus application is installed, Windows Defender will occasionally become active and again ask the user to turn on Windows Defender and uninstall other antivirus applications.

 

And all of it is not even beneficial to the user.

“Defender gives by far not the best experience, but a below average one in the market,” Kaspersky writes in a blog titled, ‘That’s It. I’ve Had Enough!’

 

He also has an idea what Microsoft is up to, “The trend is clear: Microsoft is gradually squeezing independent developers out of the Windows ecosystem if it has its own application for this or that purpose.”

 

Kaspersky goes on stating, “The company’s [Microsoft’s] intentions are easy to work out: (i) to try and get everyone to head over to the Windows Store; (ii) to levy an additional tax on independent developers; (iii) to strictly control who can do what; (iv) to suppress the competition with standardization and regulation; and (v) to further gradually take over the whole ecosystem – all to provide stable growth of profits. Put another way – to have a totalitarian/police-state platform in which there’s no place for independent developers or freedom of choice for users.”

 

Kaspersky Lab has therefore decided to take action, “We’ve taken the decision to address official bodies in various countries (including the EU and Russia) with a request to oblige Microsoft to cease its violation of anti-competition legislation and to remove the consequences of that violation.”

 

The company wants Microsoft to provide new versions and updates of Windows to independent developers in good time so they can maintain compatibility of their software to Windows. It also wants to force Microsoft to explicitly inform the user of the presence of incompatible software before upgrading Windows and to recommend the user to install a compatible version of the software after the upgrade and to always explicitly ask the user for his/her approval to enable Windows Defender.

 

Also other antivirus vendors are unhappy according to Kaspersky, “Despite Microsoft slowly killing off the independent security industry, so far, we’re the only ones who have bitten the bullet and decided to say something about this publicly.”

 

Kaspersky also warns that not only security companies should be worried about Microsoft’s business tactics, also other software developers on the Windows platform are in danger. Therefore Kaspersky calls for all independent software developers to “form an united front and all fight together”.

 

Article source

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Replies 5
  • Views 800
  • Created
  • Last Reply
9 hours ago, hfaz63 said:

That is why I bought my laptop without an OS (ahem, Win 10). Microsoft’s business tactics are destroying PC market.

 

4 hours ago, MayJoko said:

You can't compete with free!

 

You don't have to use Windows 10 and free isn't necessarily good if you believe the old adage of you get what you pay for. I have hundreds of retail licenses for Win 7 Pro and 8.1 Pro, I have been hoarding them and now I have found a PC support business that buys retail Pro licenses directly from Microsoft, online, for $40 each.  He has been getting them in groups of 10 as he needs them and then sells them for $150 each plus labor to install them on systems that people upgraded to Windows 10 and now want to go back but can't do a rollback.  (Walmart will sell you an OEM Win 7 SP1 Pro package for $122.)  Anyway, I managed to talk this guy into selling me 100 licenses for $50 each cash.  Don't know how much longer he will be able to get them so thought I should stock up.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...