Jump to content

Market share of antivirus vendors and products


anuseems

Recommended Posts

A new report from OPSWAT determined the market share for the top five antivirus vendors with RTP enabled. It includes:

Avast 21.4%

Microsoft 19.4%

AVG 8.6%

Avira 7.4%

Symantec 7.1%

Among specific antivirus products, Microsoft Security Essentials had the highest market share, closely followed by avast! Free Antivirus and Avira Free Antivirus.

http://www.net-security.org/secworld.php?id=17887

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Replies 16
  • Views 2.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

What I found interesting was what the rest of the article said was

While the overwhelming majority of devices surveyed had at least one antivirus engine installed, only 8.7% had run a full system scan in the last 7 days, meaning over 90% of devices had not run a full scan in that period, putting them at risk for infection and in possible violation of data security regulations.

That means the majorly just relies on Real time they dont even do scans , ;) M$ and Avast owns most of the market share for years now so that's nothing new .. People are going to use whats free they always have regardless of what other AV test says best.. Because there not buying a key for you . :lol: If I go to someones home and they need a Antivirus and ant-malware I dont go looking for no free giveaway or crack . I just install Avast free and Malwarebytes free on it for them. Even my nephew who is going to collage to be tech that works on computers . They all have free Avast on there computers .In the real world no one looks for giveaways much are cracks they use what is free . :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites


If you read in the article that the most installed anti-malware is Malwarebytes free they have 20% marketshare but the screenshot is for those that have real time. The reason for this many small business is to lazy or cheap to buy protection for there server and pay some tech to clean it up with Malwarebytes. They wait tell there been infected to fix it .That's why there talking about passing laws making them report when they been breached and making it law for them to get good protection .

This is the overall report .

7UqMU1w.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Since AntiVirus means Real-Time Protection,

the exclusion of Malwarebytes FREE,

-which is just an On-demand/Malware Removal Tool-

was resonable.

Even Malwarebytes PRO,

which offers Real-Time Protection,

is an AV Complement and Not a full AV Substitute.

Therefore, for the AV Vendors offering

complete AV solutions (i.e. Real-Time Protection included)

Market Share (according to OPSWAT...) is the one listed HERE

xh2k2k88ibjmlxrr950s_s.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Since AntiVirus means Real-Time Protection,

the exclusion of Malwarebytes FREE,

-which is just an On-demand/Malware Removal Tool-

was resonable.

You look in the pdf the 2nd page is what I posted .. Regardless of what OPSWAT says or real time Malwarebytes owns more of the market than the rest of them. That means many places dont even use real time and some just use it for a 2nd opinion. But still its used the most witch I find ironic because in test you posted before it ranked really low .

Here is the page not just part of it

TfdzsWa.png

In the last week i've posted about 2 malwares that no antivirus can pickup they may well use free avast or something, there's too much evidence out there now that people put to much dependence on these programs and malware there releasing now days can get by them. ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Regardless of what OPSWAT says or

real time Malwarebytes owns more of the market than the rest of them.

Real-Time Malwarebytes?

*** BUT ***

The report refers to the on-Demand version of Malwarebytes; the Free version of Malwarebytes!!!

xfyh7amif5o9mvmxvt3zn_s.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Regardless of what OPSWAT says or real time Malwarebytes owns more of the market than the rest of them.

Real-Time Malwarebytes?

The report refers to the on-Demand Malwarebytes.

The Free Malwarebytes; not the PRO one.

xfyh7amif5o9mvmxvt3zn_s.jpg

Also its reported that what they say may not be true.

Please note that OPSWAT is not a research institution and makes no claims on the accuracy of this data in the real world marketplace; this report aims to distribute the unique data collected to inspire public discussion, not to make any claims as to why changes have occurred. For a description of the data collection method and its limitations

Look how much MAM incensed in one year .

2014

qDJu2kg.png

2015.

7UqMU1w.jpg

Even back in 2014 the amount of users using all devices outranked the users who were using real time , they were just all using M$ witch Windows Defender was removed from the test in 2015 with WD removed its not very for real . :P

Concerting the fact in Q4 that OPSWAT Report Finds 70% Windows Devices Out of Date

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Even back in 2014, the amount of users using all devices outranked the users who were using real time
This was true for Microsoft and Malwarebytes only; not for the rest developers like avast!, ESET, Kaspersky, Avira etc. Why is this something of special importance?

What has a report with data on System Health,

like the OPSWAT Report Finds 70% Windows Devices Out of Date,

to do with the Market Share of Antivirus products?

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Even back in 2014, the amount of users using all devices outranked the users who were using real time
This was true for Microsoft and Malwarebytes only; not for the rest developers like avast!, ESET, Kaspersky, Avira etc. Why is this something of special importance?

What has a report with data on System Health,

like the OPSWAT Report Finds 70% Windows Devices Out of Date,

to do with the Market Share of Antivirus products?

What do OPSWAT who makes Gears that I never heard of tell I seen and OPSWAT market share report know about the market share ? There sure never will be in it ever no one uses Gears that I know . :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Ever heard of AppRemover ?

It is the Free brother of OPSWAT GEARS...

Yes its that crappy software that cant remove much stuff on x64 , Sure I know about it I use to post software on appznet and I stopped updating the topic because its not very good. There we were only allowed one topic for every software .

But what i want to know how is App remover related to Gears besides its made by OPSWAT ?

Gears does this

Determine if Remote Users and Managed Devices are Compromised

Appromever dont do nothing but mostly remove anti malware programs form x86 some x64 but very little and a lot of its signatures are out of date

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Well, there you are with OPSWAT...

They dont do the same thing . That's like MAM and MAE . I use MAE because it helps protect against exploits but I dont use MAM its ant-malware because I use Hitman Pro and NOD32. But I still install MAM free on people who are computer illiterate computers along with avast free some protection is better than none. :P

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • 6 months later...

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...